Evolution
From The Unicist Wiki Library
Contents |
Evolution and Fixed Points
Reality is in motion. Man has, by nature, a great difficulty to understand this motion. One can only understand it if sized among fixed points.
Heraclites, the Greek philosopher, said that one cannot step into the same river twice. Perhaps that is why he was named “Heraclites the Obscure”. Truth Tables (true – false) are static and can therefore be observed by the ordinary man.
The only way to solve the issue of observing a reality in motion is by placing fixed points working as reference. Only after watching motion from and towards fixed points we can draw a trend.
The Unicist Theory of Evolution relies on the fixed structure set by the concepts at a given time. While structures are defined, concepts are in motion. This theory sets the laws of evolution that allow to predict the motion of concepts pursuant their functionality in their specific unified field, their gravitation forces, and the universe they belong to.
The concepts are fixed structures that enable the determination of trends. The credibility area of an extrinsic concept at a given time determines the evolution starting point.
Evolution and time
Understanding evolution also implies comprehending the time within which it occurs. Time is defined as the space of a vital cycle that takes place between two events. Hence, time presupposes the link between events and it makes sense to measure time if there is evolution or involution.
There are events that occur instantaneously and others that occur in a differed manner, between a concept and its sub-concepts.
For an individual, his personal image is necessary to establish a stable link with another.
Image is built over time, and thus a concept in which the image is a part of, typical in commercial actions, implies the passage of time.
Times are relatively short in verbal functions, a little longer in adverbial ones which work as functional myths, and very long in the central value. Evolution times may somehow be sped up and lowered, but they can never be changed.
In order to measure the times of a given situation or of an evolution, it is very useful to count with the knowledge of times of a homologous situation, that is, those based on the same concepts. Times depend on concepts and not on forms. Analogous situations are of no use to draw experience from and only serve as “time fallacies”, which are taxonomic fallacies.
How evolution takes place
When talking about evolution, we always refer to the evolution of a reality that is regulated by the multiple concepts organizing its “unified field”. The question answered by the Unicist Theory of Evolution is how this evolution is produced and how it can be anticipated to influence as far as it is possible.
Evolution always occurs by the “verbal function effect”. Adaptation to the environment is lost when the action where the adverbial function is materialized stops being functional to the existence of a concept in its current state.
In this case, there are two possibilities: either the adverbial function compensates the dysfunctionality or it does not.
In order to adjust this, the adverbial function starts up the verbal function it has as sub-concept of the original concept. This compensation may be reached or not.
If reached, there is an adjustment effect which is functional to the balance at a given time and let repairing or self-repairing mechanisms adjust the dysfunctionality.
When there are no chances of repair, the balance of the credibility area must have changed in the case of an extrinsic concept, or there must have been a change in the functionality area when dealing with an intrinsic concept.
It may also happen that the adverbial function (homeostasis) cannot compensate the unbalance situation produced by the dysfunctionality of the verbal function. Should that be the case, there is a modification of the substantive function.
In this case, a mutation must have taken place. When purposes chan-ge mutation occur. Mutations may be qualitative or structural. By qualitative mutations we mean those that modify the quality of the same structural purpose.
Structural mutations are those where the purpose changes completely. Structural mutations frequently occur when, in chaotic situations, there appears an external gravitating force which intends to “absorb” a unified field.
It is very difficult to know exactly when the mutation will take place and what it will result in. What it is possible indeed is to build alternative scenarios which allow a better adaptation to the environment.
The Butterfly Effect of the Chaos Theory
When a concept changes its purpose, and integrates a unified field, it may have an influence to structurally change reality or not.
When a purpose is not reached and it is the basis for the integration of a complex reality, it is likely to produce a “0” (zero) effect in the reality integration, so the whole of it enters chaos.
Before this occurs, other sub-concepts “will try” to compensate the dysfunctionality, so, the energy intends to keep the structure of the unified field central concept.
Every dysfunctionality causes a modification in the energy direction and an entropy of the complex system seen as a unit. Energy is lost trying to self-repair instead of being destined to reach the purpose of the system.
Forecast of a complex system
In order to forecast a complex system it is necessary to have the map of the concepts integrating it. This “self-organizers” map aims at de-veloping the functional structure of a given reality to be able to fore-cast the possible changes produced by the effects of external gravitating forces or internal conceptual structures in a unified field.
At present, the conceptual structures that belong to three fields of human behavior are already developed:
- The individual field
- The institutional field
- The social field
By strictly following the facts that occur in reality, it can be inferred whether they correspond to facts that are functional or dysfunctional to a previously existing conceptual balance. From this on, it can be inferred whether these facts trigger changes in the previously existing “normality” or are just different shapes adopted by the same normality.
Thus, having the conceptual map of a reality, a forecast of its evolution can be developed always remembering that there are so many ambiguous elements in reality that the result will have:
“certainty of error and probability of nearness”.
