Concepts
From The Unicist Wiki Library
Contents |
Concepts
Concepts describe the living creatures’ essences and their evolution laws. Living creatures posses intrinsic concepts. This means that they exist in themselves and only need discovering. Inanimate beings have extrinsic concepts. Inanimate beings have those concepts that are deposited in them according to their functionality.
Concepts determine the logic and pre-logic behavior of living creatures. This is why the concepts structure is cross-cultural, since there is a generic concept for each species that defines it as such, and it is also timeless as long as the species does not become extinct.
The concept as an evolution regulator
There is one concept that describes the essential functional structure regulating evolution. It could be intrinsic to a being and regulate its evolution, determining its functionality.
However there are extrinsic concepts which are those that men place on subjects and objects surrounding them. In this case, concepts determine a “credibility of functionality”.
A concept is set by three elements. Its purpose or substantive function defines the being’s vital function. The purpose of all living organism is that of staying alive.
The verbal function complies with its function so that the living organism evolves and thus entropy is implicit. The goal of the adverbial function is that of preserving the being’s energy therefore limiting the verbal function so that the purpose does not change.
Evolution of a given reality, once we know the concepts map, starts with a modification of an action.
If we observe the functionality of the human nervous system and assess it in a conceptual way, we will notice that if the motor system performs dysfunctional actions to the vital function, such as, putting a hand on fire, the sensory system shall have to develop maximum capacity to endure the pain to avoid the situation from destabilizing.
But if the sensory system can no longer compensate the dysfunctional action performed by the motor system, the withdrawal of the hand from the fire takes place, or a functional alteration in the hand that the man has placed on the fire, hence losing the vital functionality of the said one.
The functionality area of the member disappears and its function becomes “0” (zero). It ceases to comply with its function within the living organism that will need to make up for its lack with other functions capable of complying with the same role and task.
Mutations
We define mutation to all structural change in the purpose of a being, or of any of its “vital subsystems”. We refer to mutation every time that a subsystem is somehow annulled for some non-“traumatic” reason, and this is hence transmitted to future generations.
Modifications of functions will cause different effects according to the role the functions comply with. Mutations occur when the purpose of given concepts change.
If there is a modification in the adverbial function mutations could take place, and even if there is none, the system has lost stability and will generate a change in the verbal function.
Socially, there is mutation when there is a change in the habits of a given society. The purposes of a society are implicit in its habits.
The unified field
Whenever we describe an evolution theory we refer to universal laws that are applicable to actual fields. In order to apprehend actual fields man bears his own perception capacity restrictions. That is why different people are able to apprehend different realities.
From an objective point of view, there is only one reality. We define this reality as a unified field restricted by an arbitrary decision, though functional to man.
The amplitude of the unified field depends on the capacity to adapt to environment. The adaptation capacity belongs to the individual participating. When the individual merely seeks to flow through environment and subordinates to it, adaptation is not possible. The same holds true when he intends to dominate it.
No subordinate, opponent or dominant may apprehend a unified field. This is a restriction posed by man’s own mind.
Operating in a unified field of a certain reality, working in and with it calls for a previous capacity to apprehend it. Even though the unified field of a given reality includes its most abstract aspects; there is no chance to actually apprehend it if it does not encompass its most concrete aspects as well.
Operation is the demonstration that one has apprehended the essence of a given reality. The term “wisdom” stems from “the ability to do”.
The depth with which a unified field may be apprehended depends on the type of thought of individuals. One may apprehend unified fields in their most operative aspects or go as far as possible, but always including its operative aspects.
The different types of thought imply different depths of apprehension of a unified field.
Many times, acting on a unified field does not require managing essential aspects since the latter are not functional to what one wants to do. For instance, in order to make a program in a computer there is no need to know the conceptual aspects of a computer.
Fallacies are mechanisms that avoid apprehension of a unified field in all of its depth. When one is overwhelmed by a given reality there are two possible paths: accept it, hence seeking to apprehend it or not, or “solve” the conflict through fallacies.
